USPTO serial 76185894
PEERLESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PEERLESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Preston C. Regehr
PRESTON C REGEHRONE UTAH CTR201 S MAIN ST STE 1800SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84145Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer peripheral hardware devices containing memory storage; computer memory storage devices, namely hard disk drives, removable hard disk drives, magnetic disk drives; blank hard disks and removable hard disks, blank magnetic disks or cartridges; computer memory storage controllers; computer peripherals for use in data storage, playback, recording and editing digital audio or video, computer disaster recovery, file backup and retrieval; user manuals sold as a unit with any of the foregoing goods | ABANDONED | May 24, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | CRTP | REG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 4, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 6, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 22, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 22, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 22, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 4, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 27, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |