USPTO serial 76186187
DIRECTSERVER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIRECTSERVER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark B. Harrison
MARK B HARRISON VENABLEP O BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-9998UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER HARDWARE; COMPUTER SERVERS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN PROVIDING REMOTE STREAMING ACCESS TO COMPUTER SERVERS AND FOR USE IN PROVIDING THE ABILITY TO COLLECT, PROCESS, STORE AND FORWARD REMOTE STREAMING TELECOM DATA; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN DATA ACQUISITION AND PROCESSING, FOR COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS APPLICATIONS; PERFORMANCE COMPUTER STORE AND FORWARD SERVER FOR CAPTURING LARGE VOLUMES OF DIGITAL OR ANALOG DATA STREAMS, PROCESSING THEM ON-THE-FLY, AND RECORDING THEM IN REAL-TIME; TELECOM SIGNAL COLLECTION SERVER ENABLING THE CAPTURE OF FULL-FRAME DATA STREAMS FOR REMOTE ANALYSIS; CUSTOM DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF INTEGRATED COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE SYSTEMS; COMPUTER CONSULTING SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |