USPTO serial 76186764
CLOUD 9
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 2, 2004
- Examiner
- ALVES, RICHARD
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CLOUD 9?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Papillion, NE
Papillion, NE
Papillion, NE
PAPILLION, NE
ALLIED TOBACCO CONSULTING AND DISTRIBUTION, INC.
ELGIN, IL
Other trademarks owned by ALLIED TOBACCO CONSULTING AND DISTRIBUTION, INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael C. Schilken
MICHAEL C SCHILKEN GROSS & WELCH PC800 COMMERCIAL FEDERAL TWR2120 S 72ND ST STE 800OMAHA, NE 68124-2355Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Incense | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Four-T Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Four-T Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Four-T Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by CLOUD 9 PRODUCTS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by ALLIED TOBACCO CONSULTING AND DISTRIBUTION, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named CLOUD 9
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 24, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |