USPTO serial 76187357
CHICK'N CHEDDA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 7, 2002
- Examiner
- CARTY, GEORGIA
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CHICK'N CHEDDA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael A. Doctrow
Michael A. Doctrow McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC100 Pine Street, P.O. Box 1166Harrisburg, PA 17108-1166UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | Pet food and edible pet treats | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Old Mother Hubbard Dog Food Co., Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Old Mother Hubbard Dog Food Co., Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Old Mother Hubbard, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by WELLPET LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named CHICK'N CHEDDA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2012 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 21, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 6, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 9, 2007 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 5, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |