USPTO serial 76187706
VERIFIDES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMOTHE, LESLEY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VERIFIDES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roger P. Furey, Esq., Sylvia D. Davis, Esq.
ROGER P FUREY ESQ SYLVIA D DAVIS E KATTEN MUCHIN ZAVIS ROSENMAN1025 THOMAS JEFFERSON ST NW STE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20007UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Licensing customized hardware, software, and firmware for controlling access to and preventing unauthorized copying and distribution of digital content | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, designing, implementing and integrating customized hardware, software, and firmware for controlling access to and preventing unauthorized copying and distribution of digital content | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Veridian Information Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Veridian Information Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named VERIFIDES
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 29, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 15, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 15, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 7, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 23, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 12, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 23, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 12, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |