USPTO serial 76188052
CARRIER PROFILE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 29, 2003
- Examiner
- SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CARRIER PROFILE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William C Cahill
WILLIAM C CAHILL CAHILL, SUTTON &THOMAS PLCPARK ONE2141 E HIGHLAND AVE STE 155PHOENIX, AZ 85016-4791Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Providing on-line electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among computer users ( concerting ) * CONCERNING * trucking companies | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| May 27, 2003 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 29, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 7, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |