USPTO serial 76188054
CENTER FOR ESSENTIAL EDUCATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2765852Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 16, 2003
- Examiner
- MARTIN, EUGENIA K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CENTER FOR ESSENTIAL EDUCATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Curtis L Brown
1220 Far Paddock Rd.Waco, TX 76705UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | printed educational publications, namely, books, curriculum materials, student workbooks, teacher's manuals, seminar and workshop handouts, printed charts, [ plastic overhead transparencies, ] and book covers, all in the areas of academic, religious, and craft subjects from elementary through college levels | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 23, 2000 |
| 041 | educational services, namely, lectures, seminars, workshops, festivals, craft fairs, panel discussions, video presentations, slide presentations, films, overhead projections, guided tours, self-guided tours, media presentations and multi-media presentations, all in the fields of academic, religious, and craft subject from elementary through college levels | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 22, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 25, 2009 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 8, 2009 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 28, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 3, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2003 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |