Drawing for MAGFINE

USPTO serial 76188191

MAGFINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
โ€”
Examiner
BAIRD, MICHAEL
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MAGFINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian D Anderson

BRIAN D ANDERSON OBLON SPIVAK MCCLELLAND MAIER & NEUSTADT1940 DUKE STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009MAGNETSABANDONEDโ€”

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 25, 2006MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISIONโ€”
Apr 25, 2006ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISIONโ€”
Apr 25, 2006OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999โ€”
Apr 25, 2006OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999โ€”
Sep 30, 2004OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999โ€”
Jun 29, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVEDโ€”
May 25, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 5, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATIONโ€”
Mar 16, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTERโ€”
Feb 20, 20041.BDSec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETEDโ€”
Feb 20, 200444EASEC. 44(E) CLAIM ADDEDโ€”
Feb 20, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Feb 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Aug 20, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”
Aug 19, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWNโ€”
Aug 19, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”
Jul 25, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRSโ€”
Jul 18, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”
Jun 17, 2003PCGRPETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTEDโ€”
May 29, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVEDโ€”
Nov 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Jul 22, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVEDโ€”
Jul 19, 2002PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVEDโ€”
Jun 11, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 22, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATIONโ€”
Feb 10, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTERโ€”
Dec 5, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Jun 5, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance