USPTO serial 76188215
SPN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce Goldner
BRUCE GOLDNER SKADDEN ARPS SLATE4 TIMES SQ FL 24NEW YORK, NY 10036-6522UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in electronic transmission of messages and documents; communications software for connecting computer network users and global computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | On-line services, namely, transmitting electronic messages and documents; providing multiple user access to a global computer information network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2003 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |