USPTO serial 76188228
ALICELAB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ALICELAB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
20123 MILANO, IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James V Costigan
James V. Costigan HEDMAN & COSTIGAN, P.C.1230 Avenue of the Americas, 7th FloorNew York, NY 10020UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | SAVINGS BANK SERVICES; BANKING; CHECK CASHING SERVICES; FINANCIAL INFORMATION IN THE NATURE OF RATES OF CURRENCY EXCHANGE; FINANCIAL INFORMATION IN THE NATURE OF STOCK EXCHANGE PRICE QUOTATIONS; FINANCIAL GUARANTEE AND SURETY SERVICES; ESTATE TRUST MANAGEMENT; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; CREDIT BUREAUS; FINANCIAL ANALYSIS AND CONSULTATION; FINANCIAL CLEARING HOUSES; INVESTMENT CONSULTATION; SERVICES CONSISTING OF ISSUING TOURIST CHEQUES AND LETTERS OF CREDIT; REAL ESTATE SERVICES, NAMELY, SITE SELECTION AND APPRAISAL SERVICES; INSURANCE BROKERAGE SERVICES; CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE ORGANIZATIONS; FINANCING SERVICES; BROKERAGE IN THE FIELD OF STOCKS AND REAL ESTATE; INSURANCE E UNDERWRITING IN THE FIELD OF RISK MANAGEMENT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 25, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 24, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 27, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |