USPTO serial 76188283
GEDAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, EUGENIA K
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GEDAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barth X. deRosa
BARTH X DEROSA STEVENS DAVIS MILLER & MOSHER LLP1615 L ST NW STE 850WASHINGTON, DC 20036-5622UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | television sets, audio and video tape recorders, CD and DVD players, radio aerials, radios, distribution machines, for use in the field of vehicle sales, leasing, renting, and vehicle repair services; parts for computers, computer peripherals, namely radio transmitters and radio receivers of vehicle information, scanners, and printers for use in the motor vehicle field of use, computer hardware and computer software used for the testing and diagnosing of automobiles in the motor vehicle field of use | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | educational services, namely, conducting classes, seminars, conferences, workshops in the field of science, technology, automotive design technique and engineering; entertainment in the nature of live musical groups, television comedy series, ethnic festivals; sporting events, namely, soccer, football, rugby, cricket, polo, baseball; conducting entertainment exhibitions in the nature of magic shows, chess matches, sports competitions, wine festivals; organizing exhibitions for sporting, artwork, nature, environment purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | rental of computer software and computer rental | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GEDAS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
- Other trademarks owned by gedas GmbH VW-Gesellschaft fur technische Datenverarbeitungssysteme mbH
- Other trademarks owned by GEDAS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named GEDAS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 25, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 5, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 21, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 23, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 30, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 10, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 23, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |