Drawing for TRAVELMEDISYS

USPTO serial 76188443

TRAVELMEDISYS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STINE, DAVID
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRAVELMEDISYS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SIMOR L MOSKOWITZ

SIMOR L MOSKOWITZ JACOBSON PRICE HOLMAN & STERN400 7TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2237UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042PROVIDING AN ELECTRONIC ONLINE INTERACTIVE DATABASE IN THE FIELD OF HEALTH INFORMATION TO INDIVIDUALS, CORPORATIONS AND INSURANCE COMPANIES VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 14, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Feb 14, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 14, 2005NAUDREPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED—
Jan 12, 2005LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED—
Jan 12, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 29, 2003GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 15, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 15, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 14, 2002REINREINSTATED—
Jan 29, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 10, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 26, 2001UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
May 24, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 30, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance