Drawing for ONOMASTIC NORMALIZATION ENGINE

USPTO serial 76188673

ONOMASTIC NORMALIZATION ENGINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KAZAZIAN, MICHAEL H
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ONOMASTIC NORMALIZATION ENGINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan Upton Douglass

SUSAN UPTON DOUGLASS FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software used in the field of multilingual domain name to associate and/or identify semantically identical or similar characters, words, or phrases, featuring associations such as traditional Chinese/simplified Chinese and Kana/Kanji in Japanese; and related printed instructional materials distributed therewithACTIVE—
035Licensing of computer softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 13, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 3, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 6, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 6, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 17, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 23, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 23, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 23, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance