USPTO serial 76188813
FIRST FRONTIER ARCHWAY MONUMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OSLICK, SCOTT
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FIRST FRONTIER ARCHWAY MONUMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eric J Carlson
ERIC J CARLSON WINSTON & STRAWN35 W WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Providing educational and entertainment services for a historical attraction in the nature of an exhibition, namely, historical exhibits, informational exhibits, free standing historical displays, sculptures, walk-through interactive exhibits, collections of historical information and memorabilia, informational kiosks and multimedia presentations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 11, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 31, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 30, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 10, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 7, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |