USPTO serial 76188859
IP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lucy B Arant
LUCY B ARANT RUSS AUGUST KABAT & KENT12424 WILSHIRE BLVD FL 12LOS ANGELES, CA 90025-1052UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SOFTWARE, COMPUTES AND COMPUTER PERIPHERALS; TELECOMMUNICATION APPARATUS | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | BUSINESS INTERMEDIATION RELATED TO BUYING AND SELLING; BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND BUSINESS ORGANIZATION CONSULTANCY; CONSULTS RELATED TO DOING BUSINESS USING THE INTERNET; ADVERTISEMENT AND MARKETING CONSULTANCY RELATED TO E-COMMERCE; SERVICES OF TELEPHONE OPERATORS IN CALL CENTER | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | MAINTENANCE, INSTALLATION AND REPAIR OF COMPUTERS, COMPUTER PERIPHERALS, COMPUTER NETWORK HARDWARE AND TELECOMMUNICATION APPARATUS | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATION; PROVIDING ACCESS TO TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORKS, INCLUDING THE INTERNET; PROVIDING TELECOMMUNICATION CONNECTIONS AND TELECOMMUNICATION APPARATUS NEEDED TO PUT DATA AND WEBSITES ON THE INTERNET | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE AND UPDATING OF SOFTWARE FOR COMPUTER NETWORKS; DRAFTING TECHNICAL REPORTS OF EXPERTS IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTERS, COMPUTER PERIPHERALS, COMPUTER NETWORKS AND TELECOMMUNICATION APPARATUS, CONSULTS IN THE FIELD OF SOFTWARE, COMPUTERS AND TELECOMMUNICATION APPARATUS; CONSULTS IN THE FIELD OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS; DESIGNING AND DEVELOPING SOFTWARE; UPDATING THE MAINTENANCE OF SOFTWARE; DESIGN INTERNET WEB SITES; PROVIDING COMPUTER HARDWARE AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE NEEDED TO PUT DATA AND WEB SITES ON THE INTERNET; COMPUTER SERVICES RELATED TO PUTTING DATA AND WEB SITES ON THE INTERNET; CONSULTS RELATED TO THE USE OF THE INTERNET; COMPUTER SERVICES RELATED TO E-COMMERCE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Internet Photonics, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named IP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 11, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 4, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |