Drawing for UNLOCKING THE BEAUTY OF BROADBAND

USPTO serial 76188873

UNLOCKING THE BEAUTY OF BROADBAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UNLOCKING THE BEAUTY OF BROADBAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christina D Yates

CHRISTINA D YATES FOLEY & LARDNER402 W BROADWAY 23RD FLSAN DIEGO, CA 92101-3542UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software and equipment, namely computer modems, network hubs, network routers; premises gateway, in the nature of smart house equipment, namely, data and voice distribution software and hardware for facilitating the integration of multiple communications media for communication with and control of smart house devices, namely, appliances, telephones, computers and servers, irrigation and HVAC systems; residential and commercial local area networks consisting of telephone wiring and data transmittersACTIVE—
038Telecommunications services and telecommunication subscription services in the nature of providing data and voice transmission via a local area network to customer smart equipmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 19, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 16, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 3, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 26, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 6, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 17, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 3, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 3, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 19, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance