USPTO serial 76189337
JAMBA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AXILBUND, MELVIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JAMBA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
NOTTINGHAM, GB
NOTTINGHAM, GB
NOTTINGHAM, GB
London, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter M. Eichler
PETER M EICHLER CROSBY HEAFEY ROACH & MAY PC1901 AVE OF THE STARS STE 700LOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely providing on-line computer games, gambling, interactive games, quizzes and competitions; providing on-line information in the fields of sports and entertainment, namely, music, film and television | ABANDONED | Nov 1, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GALA INTERACTIVE LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by GALA INTERACTIVE LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by GALA INTERACTIVE LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Carlton Communications Plc
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named JAMBA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 19, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 19, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | CRTP | REG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 23, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 4, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 23, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 3, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |