Drawing for JAMBA

USPTO serial 76189337

JAMBA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AXILBUND, MELVIN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with JAMBA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter M. Eichler

PETER M EICHLER CROSBY HEAFEY ROACH & MAY PC1901 AVE OF THE STARS STE 700LOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services, namely providing on-line computer games, gambling, interactive games, quizzes and competitions; providing on-line information in the fields of sports and entertainment, namely, music, film and televisionABANDONEDNov 1, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 19, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 19, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 19, 2004OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Aug 21, 2003OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Aug 19, 2003ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 1, 2003CRTPREG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY—
Mar 18, 2003R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 23, 2003ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 24, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 4, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 24, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 24, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 9, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 9, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 9, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 21, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 18, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 21, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 21, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 2, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 14, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 15, 2001IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Oct 3, 2001AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 3, 2001IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 18, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance