USPTO serial 76189598
SAKATA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 13, 2007
- Examiner
- LEE, DEBRA ANN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SAKATA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
FRITO-LAY TRADING COMPANY GMBH
BERN, CH
Sakata Rice Snacks Australia Pty Ltd.
Laverton North, Victoria 3026, AU
Other trademarks owned by Sakata Rice Snacks Australia Pty Ltd.
Sakata Rice Snacks Australia Pty Ltd.
Laverton North, Victoria 3026, AU
Other trademarks owned by Sakata Rice Snacks Australia Pty Ltd.
Sakata Rice Snacks Australia Pty Ltd.
Laverton North, Victoria 3026, AU
Other trademarks owned by Sakata Rice Snacks Australia Pty Ltd.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH J. FERRETTI
Joseph J. Ferretti FRITO-LAY NORTH AMERICA, INC.7701 LEGACY DRIVEMAIL STOP 3A-421PLANO, TX 75024Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | RICE SNACKS; RICE-BASED SNACK FOODS; RICE CRACKER BISCUITS; RICE PORRIDGE; FROZEN, PREPARED, AND PACKAGED ENTREES CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF RICE; FROZEN, PREPARED, AND PACKAGED MEALS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF RICE; FLOUR; FLOUR-BASED CHIPS; GRAIN-BASED CHIPS; AND CEREAL-BASED SNACK FOODS, NAMELY, BREAD STICKS AND PRETZELS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FRITO-LAY TRADING COMPANY GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by Sakata Rice Snacks Australia Pty Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Sakata Rice Snacks Australia Pty Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Sakata Rice Snacks Australia Pty Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named SAKATA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 3, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 28, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 8, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 22, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 4, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 4, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 17, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |