USPTO serial 76189811
VIRTUAL TELECOM ANALYST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 7, 2002
- Examiner
- BAYAT,BRADLEY
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VIRTUAL TELECOM ANALYST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Bloomington, IN
Bloomington, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin R. Erdman
HAROLD J MILSTEIN HELLER EHRMAN WHITE & MCAULIFFE LLP275 MIDDLEFIELD RDMENLO PARK, CA 94025-3506UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | business consulting services in the field of telecommunications | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 5, 2001 |
| 042 | providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software through a global computer network for monitoring telecommunications usage patterns, costs and analysis thereof | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 5, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 14, 2012 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2003 | PRA7 | REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | C.7F | REQUEST FOR NEW CERTIFICATE FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 18, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 16, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |