USPTO serial 76190113
SPEEDBROWSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2971061Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 19, 2005
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SPEEDBROWSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Denver, CO
Denver, CO
Denver, CO
LAGUNA HILLS, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul J. Reilly
Paul J. Reilly BAKER BOTTS LLP30 ROCKEFELLER PLAZANEW YORK, NY 10112UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Video distribution equipment for pay-per-view television programming, namely video switches, electronic television controllers, television signal modulators, and computer control software for operating a hotel or motel-based pay-per-view television and music, videogame and other interactive programs via a delivered programming distribution system | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 10, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OnCommand Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by OnCommand Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by OnCommand Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by HOTEL DIGITAL NETWORK, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named SPEEDBROWSE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 26, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 3, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 29, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 25, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 3, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 3, 2004 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 13, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 5, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 22, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 18, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 15, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 18, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 28, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 16, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |