USPTO serial 76190212
Serial No. 76190212
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 17, 2004
- Examiner
- FAINT, MARY CATHERINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with Serial No. 76190212?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario M5H 2V1, CA
Toronto, Ontario M5H 2V1, CA
Toronto, Ontario M5H 2V1, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicole B Emmons
NICOLE B EMMONS BAKER & MCKENZIE2300 TRAMMELL CROW CTR2001 ROSS AVEDALLAS, TX 75201-2980Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software used for investment portfolio management and administration in the field of investment services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 23, 2004 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 16, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 9, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 16, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 27, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 4, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2002 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jan 31, 2002 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Dec 14, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 19, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |