USPTO serial 76190284
EXACT LOGISTICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VOGLER, ANN LINNEHAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EXACT LOGISTICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Victoria H Finley
VICTORIA H FINLEY BAIRD HOLM1700 FARNAM ST STE 1500OMAHA, NE 68102-2002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | providing comprehensive integrated logistics services for distributors, manufacturers, customers and others; namely, warehousing and storage of products, packaging and labeling of products, transportation of goods of others by aircraft or motor truck and arranging for the international and domestic transportation of goods of others by motor truck, rail, ship or aircraft | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Professional Veterinary Products, Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Professional Veterinary Products, Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named EXACT LOGISTICS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 29, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 2, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 12, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 2, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 12, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 8, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 19, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |