Drawing for ENTERPRISE PROJECT OPTIMIZATION

USPTO serial 76190401

ENTERPRISE PROJECT OPTIMIZATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHOSHO II, ERNEST
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ENTERPRISE PROJECT OPTIMIZATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark I. Peroff

MARK I PEROFF TRADEMARK & PATENT COUNSELORSOF AMERICA PC915 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10010

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Scientific, electric and electronic apparatus and instruments, namely, computer hardware, computers, data processing equipment and apparatus, including memory, peripheral equipment, namely printers, parts and fittings for the aforesaid goods; computer software for use in database management and word processing computer software for use in the field collecting and adapting data for a common database to be shared via the Internet or other type of computer network, computer software for use in the perfection of business processes; magnetic data carriersACTIVE—
016PRINTED MATTER NAMELY BROCHURES REGARDING COMPUTER SOFTWARE; PRINTED INSTRUCTIONAL AND TEACHING MATERIAL FOR USE IN THE DEVELOPMENT AND USE OF COMPUTER PROGRAMS; BOOKS IN THE FIELD OF MANAGEMENTACTIVE—
035LICENSING OF SOFTWAREACTIVE—
042PROGRAMMING AND DESIGN FOR OTHERS OF COMPUTER, NAMELY SOFTWARE FOR THE PERFECTION OF BUSINESS PROCESSES IN SERVICE INDUSTRIES, BASED ON A COMMON DATABASE AND THE USE OF THE INTERNET OR OTHER COMPUTER NETWORK; RENTAL OF DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT; LICENSING OF SOFTWARE; PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANCY, NOT INCLUDING BUSINESS CONSULTINGACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 7, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 14, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 19, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 19, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 19, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 17, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance