USPTO serial 76190425
FAPR 2000 FEDERACION DE AUTOMOVILISMO DE PUERTO RICO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FAPR 2000 FEDERACION DE AUTOMOVILISMO DE PUERTO RICO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Oreste Ramos
ORESTE RAMOS ORESTE RAMOS LAW OFFICESPO BOX 8686SAN JUAN, PR 00910-0686UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail distributorship featuring automobile parts and accessories,arranging and conducting automobile trade show exhibitions; and promoting racing competitions and/or events of others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 23, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 26, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 19, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 4, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 18, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| May 11, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 16, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 30, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 3, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |