USPTO serial 76190476
CASPIAN NETWORKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RIRIE, VERNA BETH
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CASPIAN NETWORKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Connie L Ellerbach
CONNIE L ELLERBACH FENWICK & W2 PALO ALTO SQ STE 800PALO ALTO, CA 94306-2105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware and computer software and manuals supplied therewith for voice, data and video switching and transport for use in the telecommunications and data communications industries; telecommunications hardware and software for voice, data and video switching and transport; telecommunications and data communications equipment, namely, switches, routers, multiplexors and computer hardware for network infrastructure | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 15, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 28, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 1, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 30, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 10, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |