Drawing for VSP V-GROOVE SIDE PUMPED

USPTO serial 76190483

VSP V-GROOVE SIDE PUMPED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REGAN, JOHN B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VSP V-GROOVE SIDE PUMPED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James R. Meyer

JAMES R MEYER SCHNADER HARRISON SEGAL & LEWIS LLP1600 MARKET ST STE 3600PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7286UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Optoelectronic devices for the field of telecommunications, namely, fiber amplifiers and fiber lasersACTIVE—
038Communications services, namely telecommunications gateway services, radio communication services, telegraph communication services and telephone communication services, all via fiber-optic, cable and satellite networks; telegram transmission and communication; delivery of messages by electronic transmission; communication and transmission of messages, data, sound and images via communications networks, namely the Internet, online data processing, telephone networks and satellite transmissions; and electronic transmission of messages via computer terminal communication; rental of telecom equipmentACTIVE—
042Scientific research in the field of optical communications and telecommunications; computer software designs and programming for others; updating of computer software, computer programming for others; computer and computer software consultation; design of multimedia products for others, namely computers and computer software; design of computers for others; computer software maintenance; and research and development of new products for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 8, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 15, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 21, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 1, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 21, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 7, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 23, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 23, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 10, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 19, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 17, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance