USPTO serial 76190950
ACTIVESTAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 19, 2005
- Examiner
- MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ACTIVESTAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL P. BRENNAN; LISA M. DUROSS
MICHAEL P. BRENNAN; LISA M. DUROSS HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE PLCP.O. BOX 828BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48303UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL UNINTERRUPTIBLE POWER SUPPLIES AND COMPONENTS THEREFOR, NAMELY, BATTERIES, SURGE PROTECTORS, SURGE SUPPRESSORS, POWER OUTPUT DISTRIBUTION MODULES, AND DATA AND TELEPHONE LINE PROTECTION MODULES; EQUIPMENT FOR CONTROLLING THE CREATION, DISTRIBUTION, MONITORING AND SUPERVISING OF CRITICAL ALTERNATING CURRENT AND DIRECT CURRENT BUSES FOR COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL POWER SYSTEMS, NAMELY, CONTROLLERS FOR ELECTRICALLY CONNECTING AND CONTROLLING THE OUTPUT OF ONE OR MORE UNINTERRUPTIBLE POWER SUPPLIES, REGULATORS FOR USE WITH LINE ELECTRICAL POWER SUPPLIES, MONITORS FOR PROVIDING READOUT AND ANALYSIS OF ELECTRICAL POWER SUPPLIES, COMPUTER BASED FACILITIES MANAGEMENT SYSTEM COMPRISING COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND ELECTRONIC MONITORS AND CONTROLLERS FOR USE IN MONITORING AND CONTROLLING POWER PROTECTION; * EMBEDDED * COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR OPERATING AND MONITORING EQUIPMENT FOR CONTROLLING THE CREATION, DISTRIBUTION, MONITORING AND SUPERVISING OF CRITICAL ALTERNATING CURRENT AND DIRECT CURRENT BUSES FOR COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL POWER SYSTEMS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 15, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 29, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 28, 2011 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2011 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 12, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 5, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 2, 2005 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 21, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 13, 2004 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 13, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 20, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 1, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 4, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 18, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 18, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 11, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 22, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Oct 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |