USPTO serial 76190956
MIKRODUR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MURRAY, DAVID T
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MIKRODUR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Hebert Dubno
HEBERT DUBNO THE FIRM OF KARL F ROSS PC5676 RIVERDALE AVE # 900BRONX, NY 10471-2138UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | COMMON METALS AND THEIR ALLOYS FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF OTHER GOODS, NAMELY, CHROMIUM, MOLYBDENUM, VANADIUM, SILICON, MANGANESE, NICKEL, IRON, STEEL, TUNGSTEN, TANTALUM FOR USE IN BEARINGS AND MACHINE AND VEHICLE PARTS, NAMELY, RADIAL AND AXIAL PLAIN BEARINGS, BEARING BUSHES, BEARING INSERTS, GUIDEWAYS, AXLES, SHAFTS, BEARING HOUSINGS, TRANSMISSIONS AND ENGINES | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | MACHINE PARTS, NAMELY, RADIAL AND AXIAL PLAIN BEARINGS, BEARING BUSHES, BEARING INSERTS, GUIDEWAYS | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | STRUCTURAL PARTS FOR MOTOR VEHICLES, NAMELY, RADIAL AND AXIAL PLAIN BEARINGS, BEARING BUSHES, BEARING INSERTS FOR USE IN WHEELS, AXLES, DRIVE SHAFTS, TRANSMISSIONS AND ENGINES | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | PARTLY PROCESSED FRICTION MATERIALS MADE OF PLASTIC FOR CLUTCH FACINGS AND BRAKE LININGS; PARTLY PROCESSED FRICTION MATERIALS IN THE FORM OF BUSHINGS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | ENGINEERING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF DEVELOPMENT, RESEARCH AND DESIGN FOR OTHERS REGARDING PLAIN BEARINGS FOR USE IN AUTOMOBILE TECHNOLOGY | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FEDERAL MOGUL WIESBADEN GMBH & CO. KG
- Other trademarks owned by FEDERAL MOGUL WIESBADEN GMBH & CO. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MIKRODUR
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 25, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 8, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 18, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 25, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 17, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 19, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 19, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 27, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 7, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |