Drawing for GEAC ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS

USPTO serial 76191152

GEAC ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SLOAN, CYNTHIA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GEAC ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jon M. Jurgovan

JON M JURGOVAN MORRIS, MANNING & MARTIN, LLP1600 ATLANTA FINANCIAL CTR3343 PEACHTREE RD N EATLANTA, GA 30326

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN BUSINESS APPLICATIONS, NAMELY, FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION, HUMAN RESOURCE ADMINISTRATION AND RESOURCE PLANNING IN THE FIELD OF MANUFACTURING, DISTRIBUTION AND SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENTACTIVE—
016MANUALS FOR COMPUTER SOFTWARE BUSINESS APPLICATIONS IN THE FIELD OF FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION, HUMAN RESOURCE ADMINISTRATION AND RESOURCE PLANNING IN THE FIELD OF MANUFACTURING, DISTRIBUTION AND SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENTACTIVE—
042COMPUTER CONSULTATION AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY COMPUTER PROGRAMMING, SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT, AND TROUBLESHOOTING OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE PROBLEMS VIA TELEPHONE, E-MAIL, AND IN PERSONACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 27, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 1, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 24, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 23, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 24, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 1, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 11, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 13, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 31, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 15, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 27, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 27, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 3, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 17, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 28, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 11, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 2, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance