Drawing for IGENTIX

USPTO serial 76191168

IGENTIX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRUNO, JAMES
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - LEGAL INSTRUMENTS EXAMINER

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with IGENTIX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rechtsanwaltin Sabine Lupkemann

LAWRENCE A ABELMAN ABELMAN, FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-5621UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Technical and electrotechnical apparatus, technical and electrotechnical devices and instruments, namely; electronic signal, measuring, count, register, monitoring and control unit instruments; electronic data input; data processing, data transmission, data memory and data distribution instruments; parts of instruments named before; electronical elements to build; data processing programs; computer hardware, namely, printed circuit boards, semiconductors; integrated circuits, embedded memories, namely, embedded logic, namely embedded microcontroller unit (MCU), embedded digital signal processor (DSP) and namely micro processor unit (MPU), embedded micro controller; nonvolatile memory devices, namely, ROM placement, EPROM; FLASH; FLASH MASS STORAGE; FLASH CODE; EEPROM; and computer software for use in the design and manufacture of semiconductorsACTIVE—
035Business Management of Companies; Business Consulting Services, namely, providing Consultation in the field of Company Management; Administration and Organisation and in the use of semiconductor technology and electronic apparatus, namely, Instruments to improve Business OperationsACTIVE—
038Technical apparatus, namely to do telecommunicationsACTIVE—
042Design and development of data processing computer programs for others; rental of data processing computer programsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 16, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 29, 2002CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Feb 4, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 22, 2001UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 20, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance