USPTO serial 76191203
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Linda A. Kuczma
LINDA A KUCZMA WALLENSTEIN & WAGNER, LTD311 S WACKER DR - 5300CHICAGO, IL 60606-6630UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Wireless data products namely, wireless modems and radio modems; wireless networking equipment, namely, antennas, power supplies, cables, modems, hubs, base stations and programming software; last mile global computer network access equipment, namely, antennas, power supplies, cables, modems, hubs, base stations and programming software; wireless broadband equipment, namely, antennas, power supplies, cables, modems, hubs, base stations and programming software; wireless data equipment, namely, antennas, power supplies, cables, modems, hubs, base stations and programming software; RF equipment, namely, antennas, power supplies, cables, modems, hubs, base stations and programming software and spread spectrum wireless; voice telephony equipment, namely, antennas, power supplies, cables, modems, hubs, base stations and programming software; and computer networking equipment, namely, antennas, power supplies, cables, modems, hubs, base stations and programming software | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |