USPTO serial 76191609
INTEGRATED POLYMER PHOTONICS FOR OPTICAL NETWORKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTEGRATED POLYMER PHOTONICS FOR OPTICAL NETWORKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Monica A Riva
MONICA A RIVA FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW GARRETT & DUN1300 I ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3315UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Optical devices, components, subsystems, and modules, all for optical communications and networks, namely, optical fiber, optical amplifiers, optical modulators, optical switches, arrayed optical waveguides, optical grating filters, optical cross-connects, optical multiplexers, and de-multiplexers, optical splitters, and combiners, and lasers | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 2002 |
| 035 | Providing marketing and ordering services for others in the field of optical services for photon transmission | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 2002 |
| 040 | Custom fabrication and manufacturing of optical devices in the field of photon transmission | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 2002 |
| 042 | Providing product research and development, technical consulting, and product testing and design for new product development in the field of photon transmission | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Photon-X, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named INTEGRATED POLYMER PHOTONICS FOR OPTICAL NETWORKS
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 27, 2003 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2003 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2003 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 15, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 5, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 29, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |