USPTO serial 76191638
THE WAY THE INTERNET SHOULD HAVE BEEN BUILT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2753727Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 19, 2003
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE WAY THE INTERNET SHOULD HAVE BEEN BUILT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eric E. Grondahl, Esq.
Eric E. Grondahl, Esq. McCarter & English, LLP185 Asylum StreetCityPlace IHartford, CT 06103-3495Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Transmission of audio and video streaming media via the Internet stored in large central caches and deployed at various points along the Internet which will be electronically delivered at a later time | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 2001 |
| 039 | Electronic storage and distribution of data, namely, dynamic storage of web content in large central caches deployed at various points along the Internet which will be electronically delivered at a later time | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mirror Image Internet, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Mirror Image Internet, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Mirror Image Internet, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named THE WAY THE INTERNET SHOULD HAVE BEEN BUILT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 15, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 18, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 29, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 29, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 6, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 17, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 9, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |