USPTO serial 76191641
BLASSPORT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINK, GINA M
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BLASSPORT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sue Nam
Legal Manager, Brands NexCen Brands, Inc.1330 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bill Blass International LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Bill Blass International LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named BLASSPORT
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 7, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 11, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 11, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 16, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 5, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 30, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 14, 2003 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 16, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 26, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 31, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |