Drawing for ETIS

USPTO serial 76191692

ETIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REGAN, JOHN B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ETIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas Langer

THOMAS LANGER COHEN, PONTANI, LIEBERMAN & PAVANESTE 1210551 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10176

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic memory cards; devices for electronic transactions using electronic memory cards, namely electronic memory card terminals and servers; software tools and software applications for operating electronic memory cards and processing transactions using electronic memory cardsACTIVE—
035Business management services for others in the field of designing, manufacturing, installing and operating systems utilizing electronic payment cardsACTIVE—
042Technical consulting services for assisting banking companies with integration from magnetic stripe cards to other payment schemes, card issuance, electronic purse, and multi-application implementations; technical consulting services for assisting mobile telecommunication companies with value-added payment services in the GSM (Global System for Mobile communications) environment, personalization and over-the-air customization, prepayment solutions, and security schemes therefor; technical consulting services for assisting wireline telecommunication companies with electronic purse, prepayment solutions, and security schemes thereforACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 8, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 16, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 7, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 7, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 11, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 7, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 12, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 23, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 21, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 17, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 17, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 20, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance