USPTO serial 76191748
TUTU FRENCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TUTU FRENCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Fenwick, Old Saybrook, CT
Fenwick, Old Saybrook, CT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin G. Raskin
MARTIN G RASKIN STEINBERG & RASKIN PC1140 AVE OF THE AMERICAS 15TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10036-5803UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | WOMEN'S AND MEN'S CLOTHING, NAMELY, FORMAL WEAR IN THE NATURE OF WOMEN'S COCKTAIL DRESSES, WOMEN'S LONG AND SHORT DRESSES, SKIRTS, TOPS, JACKETS, EVENING DRESSES, WOMEN'S PANTS AND SHAWLS AND LONG SKIRTS, MEN'S TIES, CUMMERBUNDS, BOW TIES AND SUSPENDERS; SPORTSWEAR, NAMELY T-SHIRTS, PANTS, BLOUSES, TOPS, SKIRTS, SHORTS AND BATHING SUITS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 5, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 18, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |