USPTO serial 76191814
ENVOY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WINTER, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ENVOY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mincom Limited, [ACN 010 087 608]
Teneriffe, QLD 4005, AU
Mincom Limited, [ACN 010 087 608]
Teneriffe, QLD 4005, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Chad Harrison,
COUNCEL FOR THE AMERICAS MINCOM LIMITED9635 S MAROON CIR STE 100ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112-5927UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | DESIGN AND WRITING OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR OTHERS; TECHNICAL, NAMELY, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY NETWORK CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF MANAGEMENT OF ASSETS, BUSINESS PROCESSES AND LOGISTICS FOR CAPITAL INTENSIVE INDUSTRIES INCLUDING MINING, UTILITIES, TRANSPORTATION AND GOVERNMENT; TECHNICAL ADVICE AND SUPPORT, NAMELY, TROUBLESHOOTING OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE PROBLEMS; TECHNICAL SUPPORT FOR COMPUTER SYSTEMS, NAMELY TROUBLESHOOTING OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE PROBLEMS AND TECHNICAL MANAGEMENT OF COMPUTER SYSTEMS USED FOR THE PROVISION OF FULLY WEB-ENABLED INTERFACE AND SUPPORT FOR COLLABORATIVE AND E-BUSINESS PROCESSES; COMPUTER SYSTEMS INTEGRATION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE; CUSTOMIZATION OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND IMPLEMENTATION OF SUCH SOFTWARE FOR OTHERS; LEASING COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE BY THIRD PARTIES; APPLICATION SERVICE PROVIDER (ASP), NAMELY, HOSTING SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS OF OTHERS AND INTEGRATION OF COMPUTER SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS FOR OTHERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 26, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 11, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 19, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 29, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 21, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 26, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |