USPTO serial 76191842
FIRST ISSUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAMILTON, MICHAEL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FIRST ISSUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David B. Kirschstein
DAVID B KIRSCHSTEIN KIRSCHSTEIN OTTINGER ISRAEL ET AL489 5TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-6105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | LAMPS | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | WINDOW COVERINGS, NAMELY VENETIAN BLINDS AND VERTICAL BLINDS MADE OF FABRIC AND FURNITURE | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | VASES, SOAP DISPENSERS, DRINKING GLASSES, PITCHERS, BOWLS AND HOUSEHOLD ITEMS, NAMELY, SALT AND PEPPER SHAKERS, SOAP DISHES, NAPKIN HOLDERS, SUGAR AND CREAMER SETS, TOOTHBRUSH HOLDERS, TISSUE PAPER HOLDERS AND WASTE PAPER BASKETS | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | TOWELS, FACECLOTHS, SHOWER CURTAINS, TEXTILE BATHMATS, PILLOWCASES, BEDSHEETS, BED BLANKETS, COMFORTERS, COMFORTER CASES, BEDSPREADS, PILLOW SHAMS, DUST RUFFLES, DUVET COVERS, TABLECLOTHS NOT MADE OF PAPER, TEXTILE NAPKINS, CURTAINS, DRAPERIES; TAPESTRY STYLE ORNAMENTAL WALL HANGINGS MADE OF TEXTILE, AND QUILTS IN THE NATURE OF ORNAMENTAL WALL HANGINGS; FABRIC SOLD BY THE YARD FOR USE IN MAKING CURTAINS, DRAPES AND UPHOLSTERY | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | RUGS, CARPETS AND WALL TREATMENTS, NAMELY, PLASTIC OR VINYL WALL COVERINGS AND BORDERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by L.C. LICENSING, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by L.C. LICENSING, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Similar marks named FIRST ISSUE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 29, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 24, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 20, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 25, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 30, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 11, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 19, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |