Drawing for TECHPLUS INVESTING: INVESTING IN TECHNOLOGY + INVESTING WITH TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 76191883

TECHPLUS INVESTING: INVESTING IN TECHNOLOGY + INVESTING WITH TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TECHPLUS INVESTING: INVESTING IN TECHNOLOGY + INVESTING WITH TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nancy R Daspit

NANCY R DASPIT THE HISHON FIRM LLC1 ST UNION999 PEACHTREE ST NEATLANTA, GA 30309-3915

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009PRE-RECORDED AUDIO AND TEXTUAL MATERIAL RECORDED ON COMPACT DISCS, AUDIO CASSETTES AND TAPES FEATURING LESSONS DEALING WITH THE USE OF TECHNOLOGY TO ASSIST AND IMPROVE AN INVESTOR'S SUCCESS IN INVESTING IN THE FINANCIAL MARKETS, WITH AN EMPHASIS ON INVESTMENTS IN THE TECHNOLOGY MARKETACTIVE—
016SERIES OF LESSONS, IN THE NATURE OF PRINTED BOOKLETS AND PAMPHLETS, DEALING WITH THE USE OF TECHNOLOGY TO ASSIST AND IMPROVE AN INVESTOR'S SUCCESS IN INVESTING IN THE FINANCIAL MARKETS, WITH AN EMPHASIS ON INVESTMENTS IN THE TECHNOLOGY MARKETACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 13, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 16, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 7, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 8, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 16, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 26, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 30, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 19, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 23, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance