USPTO serial 76191922
PTM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FIRST, VIVIAN M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PTM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lee Ann Wheelis
LEE ANN WHEELIS THOMPSON & KNIGHT LLP1700 PACIFIC AVE STE 3300DALLAS, TX 75201-4693UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | metallic tables, plastic tables, metallic and plastic chairs, plastic boxes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Plasticos Tecnicos Mexicanos, S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Plasticos Tecnicos Mexicanos, S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named PTM
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 15, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 13, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 6, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 5, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 18, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 26, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | 44ED | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | 44ED | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 1, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |