USPTO serial 76191942
AMERICAN HARD LINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AMERICAN HARD LINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
AMERICAN BODY BUILDING PRODUCTS, L.L.C.
AURORA, IL
Other trademarks owned by AMERICAN BODY BUILDING PRODUCTS, L.L.C.
AMERICAN BODY BUILDING PRODUCTS, L.L.C.
AURORA, IL
Other trademarks owned by AMERICAN BODY BUILDING PRODUCTS, L.L.C.
Weider Nutrition International, Inc.
Salt Lake City, UT
Other trademarks owned by Weider Nutrition International, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PAUL M FULLERTON
PAUL M FULLERTON CLINGEN CALLOW WOLFE & MCLEAN LLC2100 MANCHESTER RD STE 1750WHEATON, IL 60187UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer services, namely, online publications in the nature of newsletters in the fields of health, fitness, body building, nutrition, diet, wellness, exercise, and body conditioning | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AMERICAN BODY BUILDING PRODUCTS, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by AMERICAN BODY BUILDING PRODUCTS, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by Weider Nutrition International, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named AMERICAN HARD LINE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 25, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 15, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 25, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 15, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 14, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 10, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |