USPTO serial 76191960
TRIM KIDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JACKSON, STEVEN W
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TRIM KIDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey M. Kleinman
JEFFREY M KLEINMAN GRAYBILL & ENGLISH, LLC1920 N ST NW STE 620WASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PRINTED MENUS; CALENDARS; PRINTS; POSTERS; NOTECARDS; GREETING CARDS; FLASH CARDS; NEWSLETTERS DEALING WITH OVERWEIGHT ISSUES; MAGAZINES DEALING WITH OVERWEIGHT ISSUES; PAMPHLETS; BOOKS DEALING WITH OVERWEIGHT ISSUES; PRINTED STATIONERY; ENVELOPES; INFORMATIONAL FLYERS DEALING WITH OVERWEIGHT ISSUES; BOOKMARKS; SCHEDULES; BOXES, NAMELY, CORRUGATED, PAPER, CARDBOARD, AND VIDEO CASSETTE BOXES; BROCHURES ABOUT OVERWEIGHT ISSUES; AND BLANK AND PRINTED LABELS NOT OF TEXTILE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2003 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Nov 27, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 25, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 27, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |