Drawing for AKIA NEKO

USPTO serial 76191966

AKIA NEKO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FROMM, MARTHA L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with AKIA NEKO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CLEMENT CHENG

CLEMENT CHENG LAW OFFICE OF CLEMENT CHENG17220 NEWHOPE ST STE 127FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Pencil boxes writing paper, photo albums, appointment books, diaries, stickers, greeting cards, pens, pencils, document files, pencil sharpeners, crayons, markers, correcting tape for type and letter sets a primarily composed of writing paper, pens, pencilsACTIVEJun 1, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 27, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 27, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 11, 2003GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 13, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 13, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2002CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Oct 10, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 10, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 30, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 19, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 12, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 12, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 24, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 6, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 4, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 1, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 24, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 6, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance