USPTO serial 76192060
FORTIS VALUE PREFERRED VARIABLE ANNUITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGLETON, RUDY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FORTIS VALUE PREFERRED VARIABLE ANNUITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BRUSSELS, BE
BRUSSELS, BE
UTRECHT 3584 BA, NL
UTRECHT 3584 BA, NL
Fortis Benefits Insurance Company
Woodbury, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marsha Stolt
MARSHA STOLT DAIN RAUSCHERFISH & RICHARDSON PC PA60 S 6TH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-4400Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Financial Services, Namely, Annuity Underwriting | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FORTIS (B)
- Other trademarks owned by FORTIS (B)
- Other trademarks owned by FORTIS (NL) N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by FORTIS (NL) N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Fortis Benefits Insurance Company
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named FORTIS VALUE PREFERRED VARIABLE ANNUITY
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 17, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 28, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |