USPTO serial 76192188
THE FIRST FORTY MILES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE FIRST FORTY MILES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EDWARD A. SOKOLSKI
EDWARD A SOKOLSKI LAW OFFICE OF EDWARD A SOKOLSKI3868 W CARSON ST STE 105TORRANCE, CA 90503-6706UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | CONSTRUCTION OF A HIGH SPEED RAIL LINE FOR THE TRANSPORTATION OF PASSENGERS AND GOODS | ABANDONED | Jul 2, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2007 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 14, 2004 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 17, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 26, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 4, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 14, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |