USPTO serial 76192252
WEBDOCENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOE, KELLY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WEBDOCENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
97421 Schweinfurt, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William E. O'Brien
WILLIAM E O'BRIEN363 BAILEY RDHOLDEN, MA 01520UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer programs; computer hardware and their parts; computer software for the monitoring the performance of hardware and software located on the machines for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | educational services, namely seminars, conferences and classes in the field of computer maintenance and service; publishing services, namely books, newspapers, magazines and scientific publications of every type, also in electronic media | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | providing an online database, which features information regarding the computer industry; design of web sites for others; technical support services, namely troubleshooting of computer software and hardware problems via the world wide web; creation, development and care of programs for the management of data for others; design, rental and care of computer software for other; and operation of a service hotline for computer software and hardware services; rental of access time to computer data bases | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |