USPTO serial 76192337
EMVOLVE PERFORMANCE MANAGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- PRE-EXAMINATION SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EMVOLVE PERFORMANCE MANAGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin Schwimmer
Martin Schwimmer Schwimmer Mitchell Law Firm40 Radio Circle, Suite 7Mt. Kisco, NY 10549UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software programs for use in the field of performance management and business improvement, namely, software applications for assessing and managing the performance of personnel by measuring, reporting and analyzing performance and skills demonstrated by personnel in carrying out employment functions and duties at individual, team and organizational levels on a hierarchical basis; pre-recorded compact discs containing data and information relating to performance management and business improvement solutions; downloadable electronic publications in the nature of newsletters, instructional manuals, brochures, user guides and reference guides featuring information in the field of performance management and business improvement solutions; computer software applications for assessing and managing the performance of personnel by measuring, reporting and analyzing performance and skills demonstrated by personnel in carrying out employment functions and duties at individual, team and organizational levels on a hierarchical basis and business improvement that may be downloaded from a global computer network; general purpose communications connectivity software used to establish and maintain connections between a computer and computer network; and parts and fittings for the aforementioned goods; and the instructional and informational manuals sold as a unit with a computer software and compact discs | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business management and business administration services, namely providing business consultation, advice and information relating to performance management and business improvement; providing an on-line electronic database on global computer networks in the field of performance management and business improvement | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | providing on-line publications in the nature of magazines and journals featuring information in the field of performance management and business improvement solutions from databases via a multi-user global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NICE SYSTEMS LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by Performix Technologies Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Performix Technologies Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named EMVOLVE PERFORMANCE MANAGER
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 4, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 18, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 1, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 1, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 1, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 1, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 1, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 1, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 27, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 17, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 17, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 17, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 6, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 18, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 10, 2003 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| May 7, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 31, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |