USPTO serial 76192361
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin S. Costanza
Kevin S. Costanza Seed IP Law Group PLLC701 Fifth AvenueSuite 5400Seattle, WA 98104| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electrical power generation equipment, namely, fuel cells, proton exchange membrane fuel cells, fuel cell stacks, fuel cell conversion components, fuel cell integrators, and electrical power management modules, namely, power inverters, power converters, power conditioners, power controllers and load regulators | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 21, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 25, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 22, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 10, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 10, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 11, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 1, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 2, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 7, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 17, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 3, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 22, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |