USPTO serial 76192444
PENDPRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WINTER, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PENDPRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Minneapolis, MN
Minneapolis, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MELANIE J. CICCHESE
FREDRIKSON & BYRON PA DAVID C W4000 PILLSBURY CTR200 S SIXTH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1425Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing an interactive computer database featuring an automatically updating address book, personal planner, calendar, date reminder, and travel planner; organizing of dates and events and notification services for others via email and email managers provided via a global computer network by providing application service provider services, namely by hosting computer application software on a computer server for others for reminding users in all phases of the shopping/purchasing cycle of appointments or special occasions for which they need to buy a gift, for enabling browsing, selecting and ordering items for purchase, and for fulfilling and shipping orders, all provided via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 30, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 7, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 11, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 19, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |