USPTO serial 76192459
LITHOTRODE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2799633Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 30, 2003
- Examiner
- DALIER, LAURIEL
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LITHOTRODE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MARIETTA, GA
HMT High Medical Technologies AG
CH-8574, Lengwil, CH
HMT High Medical Technologies AG
CH-8574, Lengwil, CH
HMT High Medical Technologies AG
CH-8574, Lengwil, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R. Meyer, Esquire
James R. Meyer, Esquire Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP1600 Market Street, Suite 3600Philadelphia, PA 19103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRO-TECHNICAL AND ELECTRO-HYDRAULIC APPARATUS, NAMELY, ACOUSTIC SHOCK WAVE GENERATORS AND DEVICES USED TO GENERATE AND TO FOCUS ACOUSTIC SHOCK WAVES, NOT FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | ELECTRO-TECHNICAL AND ELECTRO-HYDRAULIC APPARATUS, NAMELY, ACOUSTIC SHOCK WAVE GENERATORS AND DEVICES USED TO GENERATE AND TO FOCUS ACOUSTIC SHOCK WAVES FOR MEDICAL AND THERAPEUTIC PURPOSES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HEALTHTRONICS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by HMT High Medical Technologies AG
- Other trademarks owned by HMT High Medical Technologies AG
- Other trademarks owned by HMT High Medical Technologies AG
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named LITHOTRODE
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 17, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 17, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 14, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |